A couple of weeks ago I talked about how great it was watching Lord of the Rings. One thing I mentioned specifically was Peter Jackson's intro to the movie and how he felt really welcoming and appreciative of my (our) patronage.
Well this week I went to go see Return of the King and Jackson described something particularly interesting, at least to me.
He described how when he was a boy he read a lot about the Battle of Waterloo and the French Calvary charge on English foot soldiers. He said that he was amazed by the size of Napoleon's Calvary, 6,000 men strong. Jackson wished he could see what 6,000 men charging on horses looked like, but since the advent of technology- tanks, cars, planes, and the like- there was no need for countries to keep training Calvary. Jackson would have to make due with artist images, which look like this...
When I saw the charge during the movie suddenly it became much more important. I related it to Waterloo, and was reminded that those were real men charging into battle. Through that connection, everything on screen felt more real, more emotional. It was a great bit of film making.
If you don't believe me, look at that picture again.
And if that doesn't do it for you...
- Comments Off • Category: battle of waterloo pelennor fields, lord of the rings, movie
- Share on Twitter, Facebook, Delicious, Digg, Reddit
- Comments Off • Category: living, philosophy, Pleasanton
- Share on Twitter, Facebook, Delicious, Digg, Reddit
""It's like in the great stories, Mr. Frodo. The ones that really mattered. Full of darkness and danger, they were. And sometimes you didn't want to know the end. Because how could the end be happy? How could the world go back to the way it was when so much bad had happened? But in the end, it's only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer. Those were the stories that stayed with you. That meant something, even if you were too small to understand why. But I think, Mr. Frodo, I do understand. I know now. Folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back, only they didn't. They kept going. Because they were holding on to something. That there's some good in this world, Mr. Frodo... and it's worth fighting for.""
This tiny, fragment of that larger picture is my favorite part. When I was actually out taking the picture it was a secondary thought. My focus was on the main fall and that stick leaning into it. Now whenever I look at this photo, this is all I see...
- Comments Off • Category: philosophy, photography
- Share on Twitter, Facebook, Delicious, Digg, Reddit
1. No Ads. This is one of my biggest pet peeves. I go to a movie. I pay an entrance fee. Then when the clock rolls around and the thing I paid for is supposed to begin...I get bombarded with marketing. Do you want to go back out and get some overpriced food, drinks, and candy? No I passed it when I came in. Are you sure? You'll have plenty of time, this honestly isn't going to start for awhile. No thank you. Do you want to watch trailers for new movies? No, I have youtube. I came to see LOTR. I don't care about the upcoming Transformers.
This practice would be akin to you going to a Subway and before they let you begin they spent 5 minutes talking about other companies, products and promotions. I have no problem with the theater running things before the show. After all, that's their screen and I'm not paying to have their screen. What I am paying for is a movie that is supposed to start at a certain time. NOTHING ELSE.
The worst part is that companies keep pushing the limits. Average amount of time on ads, trailers, promotions is now close to 15 minutes for every movie. I've sat through ones that were 25 mins. I honestly have watched an episode of TV on my phone. It's like they keep pushing more and more to see how much crap we'll take. Stop it.
For the record, LOTR had no ads. At 7pm (the time my ticket said) the movie began, with only a reminder to turn off your cell phones. Classy. Intelligent. Thank you.
2. Director intros. Peter Jackson (on location while filming The Hobbit) gave a nice introduction to the movie, and will for the next two as well. He seemed genuine, happy, and, most importantly, grateful. He knows the Blu-Ray is coming soon. He knows that the DVD's are already out. He knows movie theaters can be a hassle. And he thanked us, as an audience, for coming out and watching the movie as he intended it to be seen. Uncut and on a big screen.
Outside of L.A. or film festivals people are not used to this. Trust me, it is one of the nicest things to feel that your patronage is appreciated. It also gives creators a chance to share a moment with their audience. Something, I feel, is missing too much from society today.
3. Attentive Audiences. Ever had someone ruin a movie for you? A crying baby, a loud teenager, an avid texter. The stereotypes are numerous for a reason. Other people can ruin a movie.
Not here. These people knew what they were coming for. I'm guessing 98% had seen the movies before. The 2% were those people's children who were too young or not alive when the originals were released. Either way, everyone was lovely.
In a three and half hour movie, guess what? People will move around. Bathroom breaks. Shifting to get comfy. Standing to get some blood flow. And that's ok. If you remember where you are. Everyone was respectful and quiet. Not a single cell phone went off for almost 4 hours. Let me know what the last movie was when a cell phone didn't go off.
Even the cute, completely unnecessary, ducking while you pass in the front row was a testament to the generosity of the audience. They didn't want to ruin anyone's experience because they wanted their own.
I have honestly never had a better movie going experience. And I look forward to going back for The Two Towers and The Return of the King.
The same guy who doesn't go to movies at night anymore just so I can avoid the crowds. The same guy who will drive half an hour to go to a smaller, more out of the way, less populated theater just to avoid crowds.
Property of Paramount Pictures |
Married life to a Single Person |
From Team Edserve |
Not quite that awesome. |
Green Language is a way of changing our words and actions to influence changing our thoughts.
It allows us to take responsibility for our emotions. Reminding us that we are both in control and capable of changing them.
It keeps us out of the roles people often fall into of rescuer, persecutor, and victim. All are equally as dangerous to be in because all expect things out of people that is unrealistic.
A sciency trick you can use is "naming." By naming things we see, we can shut down our amygdala (emotion center) and fire up our prefrontal cortex (logic center).
- Comments Off • Category: emotions, Green Language, psychology
- Share on Twitter, Facebook, Delicious, Digg, Reddit
I don't know about everyone else in the world but this is generally how I feel things emotionally:
Slowly. And like a tidal wave.
See tidal waves aren't like what we see in the movies. They are usually only a couple of feet high and yet can be propelled for thousands of miles from their origin point. That's my emotions in a nutshell. They are basically even-keel or comprehensible (like a 4 foot tall wave) and yet they are immensely powerful, and will sometimes overwhelm me like a helpless sun-tanner on the beach.
Over the years I've attempted multiple coping methods to deal with my emotions and today I've come to surprise myself by how well they work. And so I have decided to share. Thanks Barney.
It's okay if you didn't understand the Barney joke.
Fantastic. We've felt our emotions. We've breathed to overcome the inital rush of physiological reactions. And then we've gotten physical in order to help cope. All those things help deal with immediate emotional responses. But what about the things that seem to last and last. Surely we can't just breathe and run our way out of emotions right?
1. Be present while feeling emotions. I used to bury things. (Like any real man). Unfortanately, that often leads to bursting into tears in the work place and cursing Zeus, Odin and Captain Morgan. The truth is that we should all be aware of what we are feeling, a kind of "control your emotions and not be controlled by them" type of thing. It helps to speak the words out loud. Say, "I feel angry, sad, upset, hurt, lonely, afraid." This also works in good moments too. Saying when you are happy, excited, thankful (especially to another person who is expereincing things with you) can be a real benefit.
2. Breathe. A few deep breaths increases blood flow while steadying the heart rate. Especially handy if you are in one of those situations where testoserone and/or adrenaline has started pumping. Neurochemicals don't travel in your bloodstream, however, the oxygen that often is required to have a bodily reaction most certainly does. If you can control your breathing you are much closer to controlling your emotions.
3. Move, dance, run, be physical. Excercise is fantastic. Try to be pissed off after running 2 miles (or your health equivalent of 2 miles), it's a lot harder. There's biological reasons for this, but for the most part just know that it works. I generally go in this order for small-medium issues (bad day, argument with someone): walk, dance, walk some more. I dance. It's a thing I do. I'm not particualary good but I do it nonetheless. The thing is most people are capable of dancing and don't. I'd suggest giving it a try. For really big issues (death, break-ups) I try and immediately exhaust myself. The longer I stew in my own brain the worse I'll feel.
Dont' call me Shirley.
It's less okay if you didn't understand that joke.
I like those things because it's universal. I know those things will work for everyone. The rest is how I deal with things because it works for me. I think it will work for others but I'm not "others", so I don't know for sure.
I will complete my thoughts in the next post.
Those were awesome.
Alas, once again the Hollywood system has betrayed my excitement. Toyed with my geek emotions like a puppeteer. Of course, they do this quite often. But it hits especially close to home when they do it with one of my favorite franchises.
Let me say this. I enjoyed the movie. Watching it wasn't terrible. There were even a couple of moments (that I won't spoil) that truly made me smile. Overall though, the film was exactly what I said: flat.
The most compelling character and storyline, Erik (Magneto), played by Michael Fassbender; and his creator Sebastian Shaw, played by Kevin Bacon, is only used as a reference point. The team involved instead tries to fill the movie with philosophical arguments and weak sub-story lines, involving children we don't actually care about.
The next misstep I felt was the writing in general but especially that for Charles Xavier, played by James McAvoy. I think McAvoy is a great actor. I don't know who on the Vaughn team felt that it was a necessary move for Xavier to touch his temple every time he did something remotely mutant-y, but it became incredibly annoying as the movie dragged on.
Next? I don't understand the direction Hollywood decides to take these movies. If you are going to do a reboot then I think you should either A.) ignore everything that has ever been done before and create for yourself or B.) realize that you are creating an introduction to movies, characters, and stories that already exist.
This movie seems to do a little of both...badly. If we consider "A" The movie fails completely. It exists purely as a check list movie. Describe how Xavier loses his legs; check. Describe how Magneto and Xavier grew apart; check. Describe how Mystique joins Magneto; check. It clearly tries to exist within the stories already laid out and not create everything from scratch.
Aside for comic book readers. Whenever a movie is made from comic books, especially ones spanning multiple decades, I just assume that the movie isn't following anything honestly. That's just me. It helps me get by.
So the movie is clearly trying to exist within "B" world. And yet it completely mangles numerous storylines. And not little side characters, like Beast and Mystique knowing one another, but major ones. In X-Men 3 and X-Men Origins: Wolverine, a clearly bald and much older Charles Xavier is shown walking.
So to me this movie fails on two fronts. As a true reboot that ignores everything and creates its own story arc, it fails. To be fair it doesn't try to be that. And that's okay. What it does try to be is an introduction to the original X-Men movies. In that respects it confuses a lot of established work. And that's not okay.
Overall: B-
Characters and stories that fall flat. A confused sense of identity that doesn't live up to hardcore fanboys or even casual observers of the original trilogy. But the visuals and action scenes alone make for an enjoyable, and sometimes captivating, viewing experience.
"The great challenge of being a human is comprehending that everyone else is human and is stuck inside of their own brains just as you are stuck inside of yours, and that all of them are also frightened and excited and desperately searching for friends and lovers and everything else." -John Green
"No man is brave that has never walked a hundred miles. If you want to know the truth of who you are, walk until not a person knows your name. Travel is the great leveler, the great teacher, bitter as medicine, crueler than mirror-glass. A long stretch of road will teach you more about yourself than a hundred years of quiet introspection" -Patrick Rothfuss